The Second Appeal was closed by the High Court because the appellant failed to respond to the Court's notice served in 2012, leading the Court to conclude that the appeal could not be advanced.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 19.11.2018
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
S.A. No.274 of 2006
S.Ganesan
...Appellant
Vs.
Smt.Parvathi Ammal ...Respondent
Prayer : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the code of Civil Procedure, against the judgment and decree in A.S.No.147 of 2004 on the file of the Principal Sub Judge, Mayuladuthurai dated 23.03.2005 against the Judgment and decree in O.S.No.458 of 2001 on the file of the Additional District Munsif Mayildaduthurai dated 16.02.2004.
For Appellant : No Appearence For Respondent : Mr.S.Sounthar
JUDGMENT
The present second appeal was taken up for hearing on 10.01.2012 and this Court passed the following orders:
“it was reported before this Court by the learned counsel appearing for the respondent that the appellant's counsel died during the pendency of the second appeal. Regarding the said submission this Court directs the registry to issue notice to the appellant and post the appeal after three weeks”.
appeal pending for an unspecified period. Accordingly, the second appeal stands closed. However, there shall be no order as to costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS VI)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
mtl/sk
To
1.The Principal Subordinate Judge,
Mayuladuthurai.
2.The Additional District Munsif,
Mayildaduthurai.
S.A.No.274 of 2006
VD(CO)
CSL/12.12.2018
S.Ganesan
Smt.Parvathi Ammal
S.M.Subramaniam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
