1. Easwara Murthy v. Rangasami
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED…
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED :16.11.2018
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
S.A.No.1249 of 1997
C.M.P.No.12202 of 1997
1. Easwaramurthy
2. Somasundaram
3. Perumal
4. Karuppusami .. Appellants
vs
1. Rangasami
2. Chenniappan
3. Komarasami Nadar
4. Palani Mooppan
5. Kuttimooppan
6. Ponnamooppan
7. Muthamooppan
8. Karagamadi @ Muthusami
9. Pattamooppan
10.Muthusami
11.Ponnusami @ Melakkaran
12.Murugesan
13.Ponigannan .. Respondents
Prayer:
Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil
Procedure Code, prayed against the judgment and decree dated
23.04.1997 in A.S.42/96 before the Sub-Court, Gobichettipalayam,
preferred against the judgment and the decree dated 06.03.1996
in O.S.378/1994 on the file of District Munsif's Court,
Gobichettipalayam.
For Appellants :Ms.R.Meenal
For Respondents :No appearance
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the appellant brought to the notice of this Court that the issues between the respective parties had already been settled out of Court. In view of the submission, no further adjudication needs to be entertained in respect of the grounds raised in the present second appeal.
- Accordingly, the second appeal stands closed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition stands closed.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the second appeal requires adjudication when the issues between parties are settled out of court.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Easwaramurthy
- respondent
Rangasami
Coram
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court