S.P. Krishnan v. Kamalam
Case brief
What is this about?
Court dismissed second appeal filed against judgment deed dismissing suit for declaration of joint family properties, permanent injunction and partition. Court held no substantial question of law arises.
What did the court decide?
The second appeal is dismissed. The connected cross-objection is also dismissed. Consequently, the decree in favour of respondent is confirmed.
What the court decided
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras
Dated : 10.4.2018
Coram :
The Honourable Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM
Second Appeal No.251 of 2018 & CMP.No.6411 of 2018
1.S.P.Krishnan
2.K.Subbarayan
...Appellants/Appellants/ Plaintiffs
Vs
1.Kamalam
2.Palaniappan ...Respondents/Respondents/ Defendants
APPEAL under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree dated 15.12.2009 made in A.S.No.148 of 2008 on the file of the First Additional District Court, Erode confirming the judgment and decree dated 28.7.2008 made in O.S.No.87 of 2005 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Erode.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the Trial Court can reject witnesses without considering nature and circumstances.
Whether the father of the plaintiff was not earning and working as a forwarding agent under Railway department.
Whether tenants can claim any right over suit properties.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
S.P.Krishnan
- appellant
K.Subbarayan
- respondent
Kamalam
- respondent
Palaniappan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court