Remanded

T.Arumugam, v. The Commissioner

Madras HC9 Apr 2018WP/4526/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court quashed impugned property tax demand notices issued without a show-cause notice or inspection. It directed the Municipality to conduct an inspection, issue a provisional notice, and allow the petitioner 15 days to object before making a final assessment.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent to inspect building, issue provisional assessment notice, grant 15 days for objection, and make final assessment thereafter.

T.Arumugam, Vs The Commissioner — Municipal and Town Planning | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 09.04.2018

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM

¶5

W.P.No.4526 of 2018 &

¶6

W.M.P.Nos.5574 & 5575 of 2018

¶7

T.Arumugam ... Petitioner Vs. The Commissioner Dharapuram Municipality Dharapuram Tiruppur District ... Respondent

¶8

Prayer:

¶9

Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the respondent in his demand notice dated 03.01.2018 relating to new assessment No.154/027/00744 and Old Assessment No.154/16155, new assessment No.154/027/00745 and old assessment No.154/16156, new assessment No.154/027/00746 and old assessment No.154/16157 and new assessment No.154/027/00302 and old assessment No.154/15710 and quash the same.

¶10

Heard Mr.K.Sudhakar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.P.Srinivas, learned standing counsel appearing for the respondent.

¶11

2.The petitioner, who owns five properties, in one of which he is residing, is aggrieved by the impugned notices issued by the respondent Municipality demanding payment of enhanced property tax. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that without issuing a show-cause notice, the property tax has been unilaterally increased by several times and the action of the

¶12

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶13

respondent Municipality amounts to colourable exercise of power. Learned counsel has referred to property tax demand receipts paid by the petitioner upto the current year as per the old rates and submits that the present increase of the property tax is more than eleven times. Further it is submitted that no opportunity was granted to the petitioner and without even conducting an inspection of the buildings, the property tax could not have been revised.

¶14

3.The impugned notices do not indicate about issuance of a show-cause notice as there is no such reference in the order. Therefore, this Court can safely come to the conclusion that the impugned proceedings have been issued without affording an opportunity to the petitioner to put forth his objections.

¶15

In the light of the above, this Court directs the respondent Municipality to inspect the petitioner's building in the presence of the petitioner and assess the property to tax and issue a provisional assessment notice. The petitioner should be granted 15 days time to submit his objection to the assessment notice and after receipt of the petitioner's objection, final assessment shall be made for the properties owned by the petitioner. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS VII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar gpa To The Commissioner Dharapuram Municipality Dharapuram Tiruppur District +1cc to Mr.K.Sudhakar, Advocate, S.R.No.25906 W.P.No.4526 of 2018 W.M.P.Nos.5574 & 5575 of 2018 NM(Co) CS/10/05/18

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

T.Arumugam, v. The Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

T.Arumugam, v. The Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Thajudeen, Vs The Deputy Commercial Tax

P.Madaiyan Vs The Secretary to Government of

M/s.Nouveaux Industries Vs The Commercial Tax Officer

M/s.Phenix Builiding Solutions Vs The Deputy Commercial Tax

Tvl. Global Franchise Vs The Appellate Deputy

M/s.T.R.v.Food Corporation, Vs The Commercial Tax Officer