mother Ponnammal, she had bequeathed the suit property in his favour by way of a registered Will dated 6.12.1973, which document has come to be marked as Ex.A2. From Ex.A2, it is evident that Ponnammal had bequeathed the suit property in favour of the plaintiff. It is further seen that accordingly, following the Will, inasmuch as the plaintiff had come to enjoy the suit property as the absolute owner thereto, following the same, the patta had been transferred in the name of the plaintiff in respect of the suit property, which could be evidenced from the Chitta extract marked as Ex.A3 and further, it is the case of the plaintiff that he had put up a house portion in the property belonging to him, which had been assessed as Door No.6/23A and that, the plaintiff has also produced the tax receipt in respect of the above said house portion and also the voters list in respect of the suit property etc., and accordingly, from Exs.A5 to A16, it is evident that it is only the plaintiff, who has been in possession and enjoyment of the suit property, particularly, site No.40 and Door No.6/23A put up thereon and in such view of the matter, as rightly determined by the trial Court as well as the first appellate Court, the plaintiff has established his legal claim of title to the suit property.
