Jothi v. Vinodini & Sons
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal against a decree modifying interest rates in aSuit for recovery of goods. The High Court dismissed the appeal, holding the suit was within limitation due to acknowledgement of liability and the Chennai court had jurisdiction.
What did the court decide?
Second appeal dismissed with costs; connected miscellaneous petition closed.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
RESERVED ON : 08.03.2018
PRONOUNCED ON : 22.03.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAVINDRAN
S.A.No.2103 of 2003 Jothi carrying on business under the name and style of Jay Kay International, Erode ... Appellant Vs. Vinodini & Sons rep.by its Partner Nitin H.Shah 8 Sir Theagaraya Road T Nagar, Chennai – 17. ... Respondent
Prayer :- Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 of CPC against the Judgement and Decree dated 26.06.2002 passed in A.S.No.54 of 2002 on the file of the VI Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Madras, modifying the Judgment and Decree dated 15.02.2001 passed in O.S.No.4430 of 1997 on the file of the VII Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Madras.
For Appellant : Mrs.P.Srividya for Mr.S.Viswanathan For Respondent : Ms.R.V.Gayatri for Mr.P.B.Ramanujam
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the suit is barred by limitation due to lack of acknowledgement of liability?
Whether the City Civil Court at Chennai has jurisdiction to entertain the suit?
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Jothi carrying on business under the name and style of Jay Kay International
- respondent
Vinodini & Sons
Coram
T.Ravindran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court