Arunarajan S/O. v. the Commisisoenr
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Madras dismissed the second appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C. merely as withdrawn by the appellants, with no order for costs.
What did the court decide?
The second appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED:28.06.2018
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAVINDRAN
S.A.No.2291 of 2004 and C.M.P.No.20511 of 2004
1.Arunarajan 2.Selvanathasundaram ...Appellants/Appellants/ Plaintiffs Vs. The Commissioner, Villupuram Municipality, Municipal Building, Jawaharlal Nehruji Road, Villupuram. ...Respondent/Respondent/ Defendant Prayer:
Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the decree and judgment dated 25.03.2004 passed in A.S.No.71 of 2003 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Villupuram confirming the judgment and the decree dated 30.08.2001 passed in O.S.No.242 of 2002 before the Principal District Munsif's Court, Villupuram.
Counsel for the appellants represents that the Second Appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn and also made an endorsement to that effect.
2.In the light of the above position, the second appeal is
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Arunarajan
- appellant
Selvanathasundaram
- respondent
The Commissioner, Villupuram Municipality
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court