Dismissed
Singaram S/O.Natesa Gounder v. Pavunambla W/O.Thevarswmay Kan
Madras HCSA/1979/2004
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Unappeared second appeal dismissed.
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED:28.06.2018
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAVINDRAN
S.A.No.1979 of 2004
Singaram ...Appellant/Defendant Vs. Pavunambal ...Respondent/Plaintiff
Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the decree and judgment dated 24.12.2003 in A.S.No.80 of 2002 on the file of the Principal District Court, Villupuram reversing the judgment against the order dated 30.10.2001 in O.S.No.335 of 2000 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Ulundurpet.
For Appellant : No appearance For Respondent : No apearance J U D G M E N T
In this Second Appeal, the counsel for the appellant already reported no instructions and accordingly on the appellant being called and remaining absent, Registry was directed to list the mater today i.e., on 28.06.2018, under the caption “ for dismissal “, by printing the name of the appellant in the cause list.
2.Today, when the matter is called, there is no representation for the appellant. Appellant called absent.
3.Resultantly, the second appeal is dismissed for nonprosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition, if any, is closed.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS IX) //True copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
mfa
To
Copy to
The Section Officer,
VR Section, High Court,
Chennai.
S.A.No.1979 of 2004
AK(CO)
GN(16/07/2018)
Singaram
Pavunambal
T. Ravindran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court