Second Appeal dismissed as withdrawn by the High Court of Madras. Counsel for the appellant represented that the matter had been settled between parties.
Second Appeal dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED:20.06.2018
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAVINDRAN
S.A.No.2118 of 2004
R.Chandrasekar ...Appellant/Plaintiff
Vs. C.Jayaram ...Respondent/Defendant
Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the decree and judgment of Principal District Judge, Nagapattinam, dated 22.02.2002 in A.S.No.108 of 2001 setting aside the judgment and decree of Principal Sub Judge, Nagapattinam, dated 27.04.2001 in O.S.No.218 of 2000.
For Appellant : M/s.T.Ananthi For Respondent : No appearance J U D G M E N T
Counsel for the appellant present and represents that the matter had been settled between the parties and hence prays for the withdrawal of the Second Appeal and also made an endorsement to that effect.
2.In the light of the above position, the second appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition, if any, is closed.
mfa
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS IX)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
Chandrasekar
Jayaram
T. RAVINDRAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
