This second appeal was dismissed as abated because the sole appellant died and no representation was filed. No adjudication on merits was made.
The appeal is dismissed as abated. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated:17.12.2018
Coram:
THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE G. JAYACHANDRAN
Second Appeal No.1741 of 2004
Velliangiri .. Appellant / Appellant /
Defendant
/versus/
Venkatachalam .. Respondent / Respondent /
Plaintiff
Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 of C.P.C.,
against the judgment and decree of the Additional District Judge
(Fast Track Court No.IV, Coimbatore) at Tirupur dated 24.02.2003
in A.S.No.54 of 2002 confirming the judgment and decree of the
District Munsif Court at Tirupur dated 03.04.1998 in O.S.No.305
of 1994.
For Appellant :Ms.Mythili Suresh for
M/s Sarvabhauman Associates
For Respondent :No appearance
---------
J U D G M E N T
The learned counsel appearing for the appellant reports that sole appellant died and steps have not been taken sofar. There is no representation for the respondent. In view of the above reasons, this second appeal is dismissed as abated. No costs. Sd/Assistant Registrar(CCC) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar
To
S.A.No.1741 of 2004
RJI(CO)
SSM(21/01/2019)
Velliangiri
Venkatachalam
G. JAYACHANDRAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
