V.Shanmugam v. S.Krishnan
Case brief
What is this about?
The appellant's second appeal, filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, was dismissed on the grounds that the learned counsel for the appellants sought and obtained permission to withdraw the appeal.
What did the court decide?
No costs. Registry directed to return original documents to the lower Court.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 16.02.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.GOVINDARAJ
S.A.No.1628 of 2011
- V.Shanmugam 2. V.Sundaram ... Appellants
Vs. 1. S.Krishnan 2. The Senior Branch Manager Tamil Nadu Industrial Investment Corporation No.692, Anna Road, Nandanam, Chennai 600 035. 3.K.Gurusamy ... Respondents
Tamil Nadu Industrial Investment Corporation No.692, Anna Road,
Prayer : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code pleased to call for the records pertaining to the issue of the decree and judgment passed in A.S.No.63 of 2010 on the file of Additional Sub Judge, Dindivanam dated 28.07.2011 in confirming the decree and judgment passed in O.S.No.285 of 2006 on the file of Principal District Munsif, Dindivanam dated 31.08.2010 and set aside the same.
For Appellants : Mr.Ram Kumar
For Respondents : Mr.A.E.Dheenadhayalan
Parties & counsel
- appellant
V. Shanmugam
- appellant
V. Sundaram
- respondent
S. Krishnan
- respondent
The Senior Branch Manager Tamil Nadu Industrial Investment Corporation
- respondent
K. Gurusamy
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court