S.Sasikala v. Sasikala
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed the appeal as infructuous, holding that the matter did not survive since the minor involved had attained majority.
What did the court decide?
The appeal was dismissed as infructuous with no costs awarded.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 16.02.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.GOVINDARAJ
C.M.A.No.1679 of 2013
S.Sasikala ... Appellant/Petitioner
Vs.
- Sasikala 2. Damodharan ... Respondents/Respondents
Prayer : Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 47 of Guardian and Wards Act, 1980, pleased to set aside the judgment and decree dated 13.12.2012 made in G.W.O.P.No.137 of 2010 on the file of the Principal District Court, Coimbatore.
For Appellant : M/s.V.Anandha Moorthy For Respondents : M/s.N.Manokaran
The appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree dated 13.12.2012 made in G.W.O.P.No.137 of 2010 on the file of the Principal District Court, Coimbatore.
- The learned counsel for the appellant submitted that now the minor has attained majority. Minor was born on 15.02.1997. Therefore nothing survives in this appeal and hence the same may be dismissed.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal survives after the minor has attained majority.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
S. Sasikala
- respondent
Sasikala
- respondent
Damodharan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court