The High Court of Judicature at Madras dismissed the Second Appeal as not pressed. The appellant's counsel appeared and prayed for dismissal, which the court accepted.
Second Appeal dismissed as not pressed. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 09.04.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAVINDRAN
S.A.No.148 of 2003
Sigamani Padayachi .. Appellant Vs. V.LakshmiKandham .. Respondent
Prayer :- Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 of C.P.C against the judgment and decree dated 14.02.2002 made in A.S.No.29 of 2001 on the file of Sub Court, Panruti reversing the judgment and decree dated 21.08.2001 made in O.S.No.272 of 1996 on the file of District Munsif Court, Panruti.
For the Appellant : Ms.R.Meenal For the Respondent : Mr.Kinston Jerold JUDGMENT
Counsel for the appellant present and prays for dismissal of the second appeal as not pressed and also made an endorsement to that effect.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS II)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar adl To 1.The Sub Court, Panruti.
3.The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras(2 copies) +1cc to M/s.R.Subramanian, Advocate Sr.No.26160 +1cc to M/s.S.K.Rakhunathan, Advocate Sr.No.26109
CP(CO) sm:15.5.2018
S.A.No.148 of 2003
Sigamani Padayachi
V. Lakshmikandham
T. Ravindran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
