Mariammal v. Kaliappa Udayar
Case brief
What is this about?
The Second Appeal filed by Mariammal against a family court decree was dismissed as the appeal was settled between the parties out of Court. No costs were awarded.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 09.04.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAVINDRAN
S.A.No.1262 of 2004
Mariammal .. Appellant
Vs.
1.Kaliappa Udayar
2.Palaniammal
3.Balasubramaniam .. Respondents
Prayer : - Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 of
CPC against the the judgment and decree dated 16.07.2003 made
in A.S.No.46 of 2002 on the file of the Principal Sub Court,
Gobichettipalayam against the judgment and decree dated
19.09.2002 made in O.S.No.161 of 1999 on the file of District
Munsif Court, Gobichettipalayam.
For the Appellant : Ms.R.Meenal
For the Respondents : Mr.M.Narayanasamy
JUDGMENT
Both counsel present. Counsel for the appellant reports
that the matter has been settled between the parties out of
Court and also made an endorsement to that effect.
2. In the light of the above position, the Second Appeal
is dismissed as settled out of Court. No costs.
Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition if any, is
closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS-II)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
adl
To
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mariammal
- respondent
Kaliappa Udayar
- respondent
Palaniammal
- respondent
Balasubramaniam
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court