A review application under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC was dismissed as infructuous on the ground that the underlying matter had been settled out of court by the petitioner's counsel.
Review application dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 29.01.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI
Rev.Appl.No.136 of 2014
in C.R.P.(PD)No.2289 of 2014
Swarna Constructions,
Rep by its Managing Partner,
Jagadeesh,
Carrying business at
Arcot Road,
Thandavamoorthy Nagar,
Valasaravakkam,
Chennai 600 087. .. Petitioner
Vs.
P.L.Subramaniam .. Respondent
PRAYER: Review petition is filed under Order 47 Rule 1 read with Section 114 of C.P.C, to review the order dated 04.07.2014 passed in C.R.P.(PD)No.2289 of 2014 on the file of this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Dhananjaya
ORDER
This Review Application is filed to review the order dated 04.07.2014 passed in C.R.P.(PD)No.2289 of 2014.
2
matter has been settled out of Court and therefore, the Review Application has become infructuous.
3
V.M.VELUMANI, J. gsa
Rev.Appl.No.136 of 2014
in C.R.P.(PD)No.2289 of 2014
29.01.2018
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
None cited in textReferred
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Swarna Constructions, Rep by its Managing Partner, Jagadeesh
P.L.Subramaniam
V.M.Velumani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
