Arul v. Pavadai
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed the Civil Revision Petition, finding no merit in challenging the order rejecting the application to amend plaint. The court held the applicant filed the application belatedly without sufficient cause.
What did the court decide?
Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No costs. Connected Misc. Petition is closed.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 29.01.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI
C.R.P.(PD)No.1011 of 2015
and M.P.No.1 of 2015
Arul ..Petitioner
Vs.
Pavadai .. Respondent
PRAYER : Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the
Constitution of India, against the fair and decretal order dated 19.08.2014 made in I.A.No.1012 of 2014 in O.S.No.497 of 2010 on
the file of I Additional District Munsif Court, Kallakurichi.
For Petitioner : Mr.V.Manohar
For Respondent : Mr.S.Sounthar ORDER
The Civil Revision Petition is filed against the fair and decretal order dated 19.08.2014 made in I.A.No.1012 of 2014 in O.S.No.497
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the Trial Court's dismissal of the application for amendment of plaint as unhealthy delay in filing.
Whether the amendment sought to include mandatory injunction would change the character of the suit.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Arul
- respondent
Pavadai
Coram
V.M.Velumani
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court