Dismissed

S. Ramprasath v. the Commissioner of Police

Madras HC9 Aug 2018HCP(MD)/182/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking directions to the police to produce his minor daughter and hand over custody due to a dispute with his wife. Finding a matrimonial dispute was already pending and mediation had failed, the court found no reason to pass orders and dismissed the petition.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as no orders could be passed when matrimonial dispute is pending and mediation failed.

S. Ramprasath Vs the Commissioner of Police — Child Custody and Guardianship | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 09.08.2018

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH and

¶6

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR

¶7

H.C.P.(MD) No.182 of 2018

S.Ramprasath

... Petitioner

vs.

The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City.

¶12

The Inspector of Police, Karimedu Police Station, Madurai City.

¶13

The Inspector of Police,

¶14

All Women Police Station,

¶15

Thallakulam,

¶16

Madurai City.

¶17

B.Nithya

¶18

Bojarajan

¶19

Vijayalakshmi

¶20

... Respondents

¶21

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to produce the body or person of the petitioner's daughter by name Agathya D/o.Ramprasath aged about 3 years before this Court and hand over custody to the petitioner.

¶22

For Petitioner : No appearance

¶23

For R1 to R3 : Mr.K.Dinesh Babu

¶24

Additional Public Prosecutor

¶25

O R D E R

¶26

[Order of the Court was made by M.M.SUNDRESH, J.]

¶27

There is a dispute between the petitioner and his wife viz., the fourth respondent, over the custody of the minor child. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶28

2.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for

¶29

¶30

the respondents 1 to 3 would submit that already matrimonial dispute is pending before the jurisdictional Court.

¶31

3.In view of the above submission, we do not find any reason to pass orders in this petition, especially, when mediation is failed. This petition is dismissed accordingly.

¶32

Sd/Assistant Registrar (RTI)

¶33

/True Copy/

¶34

Sub Assistant Registrar (CS-II)

¶35

To:

¶36

The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City.

¶37

The Inspector of Police, Karimedu Police Station, Madurai City.

¶38

The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Thallakulam, Madurai City.

¶39

The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. MJ

¶40

TE/RSK/SAR-2 : 06/09/2018 : 2P/5C

¶41

H.C.P.(MD) No.182 of 2018 09.08.2018

¶42

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S. Ramprasath v. the Commissioner of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S. Ramprasath v. the Commissioner of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P. Pilavadi Krishnan Vs the Superintendent of Police

A. Anitha Vs the Superintendent of Police

Aibea Nagar(Paravai) Residents Vs the Chairman

K.K.Ramesh Vs the Government of India

S.M.Anthony Muthu, Vs the District Collector

M.S.B.Breznev Vs the District Collectior