The High Court dismissed a civil suit for recovery filed as settled out of court, quashed the attachment order made in a related application, and directed the refund of court fee.
Guards suit set as settled; attachment order in App. No. 5628 of 2017 quashed; registry directed to issue notice of raising attachment; court fee refunded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 25.04.2018
CORAM
THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
C.S.No.775 of 2016 &
A.No.5628 of 2016
Mr.N.Gopinathan .. Plaintiff
vs.
Mr.Sivabalan Kathiresan K .. Defendant
Civil Suit filed under Order VII Rule 1 of High Court O.S.
Rules 1956 read with Order 37 Rule 1 and 2 of CPC.
For plaintiff : Mr.K.V.Sundararajan
For Defendant : No appearance
2
J U D G M E N T
This suit has been filed for recovery of a sum of Rs.37,70,000/- with interest at the rate of 18% p.a. On Rs.26,00,000/- from the date of plaint to the date of realization
and for cost.
suit claim has been settled out of Court and the attachment made
in Application No.5628 of 2016 on 05.06.2017 has to be raised
and that the suit may be dismissed as settled out of Court and
also made an endorsement to that effect.
3
attachment to the concerned Registrar Office. Court Fee to be
refunded as per law.
25.04.2018
vrc
4
N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.
vrc
C.S.No.775 of 2016
25.04.2018
2 provisions across 1 enactments
N. Sathish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
