N.Padmanaban v. T.Narayanan
Case brief
What is this about?
Suit for partition and declaration was dismissed as withdrawn by the plaintiff.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated: 23.4.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR .JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
C.S. No.664 of 2017 and A.No.825 of 2017, 1124 & 3619 of 2018
N.Padmanaban .. Plaintiff
Vs.
1. T.Narayanan
2. N.Khantha
3. R.Mohana .. Defendants
The suit is filed under Order VII Rule 1 of C.P.C. r/w
Order IV Rule 1 of O.S. Rules for judgment and decree;
(i) to pass preliminary decree directing equitable partition of property described in schedule 'A' to plaint into 1/2 (half) equal shares as between plaintiff and the first defendant and to allot half (1/2) share thereon to plaintiff for his separate use and possession;
(ii) consequently to declare the purported settlement deed, dated 23.1.2017 vide its Register No.127/2017 in the office of Sub Registrar at Ashok Nagar executed by 1st defendant to and in favour of the third defendant is void ab initio and non est in eye of law and in any event does not bind or affect to the extent of plaintiff's 1/2 share on property as described in schedule 'A' thereon;
Parties & counsel
- respondent
T.Narayanan
- respondent
N.Khantha
- respondent
R.Mohana
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court