Allowed

A.Joseb Raj v. Hemachandran

Madras HC8 Nov 2018CS/187/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A suit filed for recovery of money and costs under Order XXXVII CPC was disposed of. The court recorded that the parties reached an amicable settlement and filed a joint compromise memorandum. The court decreed the suit and the compromise in terms of the joint memorandum.

What did the court decide?

The suit was decreed in terms of the joint memorandum of compromise signed by the parties on 26.09.2018.

A.Joseb Raj Vs Hemachandran — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 08.11.2018

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM

¶6

C.S.No.187 of 2018
and
A.Nos.4843 and 2532 of 2018
A.Joseb Raj ... Plaintiff
Vs
Hemachandran ... Defendant

¶7

Plaint filed and Suit numbered under Order XXXVII Rule 1 and 2 of CPC R/w. Order VII Rule 1 of Original Side Rules, praying for judgment and decree as follows:

¶8

a. To direct the defendant to pay a sum of Rs.1,35,92,219/-, together with interest at 9% p.a from the date of plaint till date of Decree and also direct the Defendant to pay the future interest till the date of realization;

¶9

b. directing the defendant to pay the cost of the suit.

¶10

For Plaintiff : Mr.S.Veeraraghavan For Defendant : Mr.N.Raja Senthoor Pandian

¶11

JUDGMENT

¶12

Mr.S.Veeraraghavan, learned counsel for the plaintiff as well as Mr.N.Raja Senthoor Pandian, learned counsel for the defendant submitted that

¶13

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶14

¶15

the dispute between the parties has been amicably settled out of Court and the parties are present and a joint compromise memo dated 26.09.2018 signed by the parties as well as the counsel, is filed to that effect, which reads as follows:

¶16

“The plaintiff has filed the above said suit for recovery and the Plaintiff and Defendant are amicably settled out of Court and there is no dispute between themselves and also they entered into an Memorandum of Compromise. For that effect, hence they are filing this Joint Memorandum of Compromise before this Hon'ble Court.”

¶17

In view of the above, the civil suit is decreed in terms of the joint

¶18

memo of compromise and the joint memo of compromise shall form part of the decree. Registry is directed to refund necessary Court fee to the plaintiff as

¶19

per Rules. No costs. Consequently, connected applications are closed.

08.11.2018

Index:Yes/No

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶24

¶25

¶26

The Sub Assistant Registrar,
Original Side,
High Court, Madras.

¶27

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶28

¶29

K.KALYANASUNDARAM, J.,

¶30

¶31

C.S.No.187 of 2018
and
A.Nos.4843 and 2532 of 2018
08.11.2018

¶32

http://www.judis.nic.in

A.Joseb Raj v. Hemachandran

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A.Joseb Raj v. Hemachandran

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Veerappan Vs the Sub Collector (North)

Kalaiselvi, Vs the Collector

V.S.Manimegalai, Vs the Collector

Mr.P.Harikrishnan Vs Mr.U.Bhagaram

T.N.Loganathan Vs Mrs.K.S.Subbulakshmi

The Ranganayaki Memorial Trust Vs