Disposed

S.M.Vimalraj v. Mr.S.M.Vimalraj

Madras HC16 Mar 2018CS/17/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment records a joint memo of compromise filed by parties in a construction contract suit. The court approved the compromise, ordered a decree based on the payment schedule contained in the memo, and ruled that no costs would be awarded in the suit.

What did the court decide?

A decree was passed in terms of the joint memo of compromise directing the defendant to pay the plaintiff a specified sum with interest; no costs were awarded.

S.M.Vimalraj Vs Mr.S.M.Vimalraj — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 16.03.2018

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN

¶6

C.S.No.17 of 2014
M/s.N.M.Construction,
Rep. by its Proprietor,
Mr.N.Manoharan,
No.60, Krishna Nagar,
6 th Street, Virugambakkam,
Chennai – 600 092.
... Plaintiff
Vs.
S.M.Vimalraj
... Defendant
Plaint filed under Order VII Rule 1 of C.P.C. read with Order IV Rule 1

¶7

of High Court Original Side Rules praying to pass a judgment and decree directing the defendant:

¶8

(a) to pay the plaintiff a sum of Rs.25,02,877/- along with interest at 18% per annum on the said sum from the date of filing the suit till the date of realization and

¶9

(d) for costs of the suit.

¶10

For Plaintiff : Mr.J.Jayabalan

¶11

For defendant : Mr.S.Anil Sandeep

¶12

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶13

¶14

J U D G M E N T

¶15

The parties have filed a joint memo of compromise setting out the

¶16

schedule of payments. The joint memo of compromise is recorded and there

¶17

will be a decree in terms of the join memo of compromise. The joint memo

¶18

of compromise will also form part of the decree. However, there will be no

¶19

orders as to costs in the suit.

¶20

16.03.2018

¶21

dsa
Index : No
Internet : Yes
Non-speaking Order
List of the witnesses examined on the side of the plaintiff :

¶22

PW1 – Mr.N.Manoharan

¶23

List of Exhibits marked on the side of the plaintiff:

¶24

*Sl.*	*Exhibits*	*Description*	*Dated*
*No.*
1	Ex.P1	True copy of the Quotation for construction work at Alapakkam site.	10.06.2012
2	Ex.P2	True copy of the Statement for complete work as on 15.11.2012.	15.11.2012
3	Ex.P3	True copy of the Statement giving details of change in work from the plaintiff to the defendant.	07.01.2013
4	Ex.P4	True copy of the Bill for construction work.	21.01.2013
5	Ex.P5	Office copy of the Letter.	01.02.2013

¶25

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶26

¶27

*Sl.* *No.*	*Exhibits*	*Description*	*Dated*
6	Ex.P6	Original reply notice from defendant's counsel to plaintiff.	14.02.2013
7	Ex.P7 series	Original Statement of account along with bills from the plaintiff to the defendant.	01.03.2013
8	Ex.P8	Notice from the plaintiff's counsel to the defendant.	06.03.2013
9	Ex.P9 (12 sheets)	Bank account statement from 01.08.2012 to 31.03.2013.	--
10	Ex.P10 (3 sheets)	Bank account statement – Axis Bank from 01.11.2012 to 31.01.2013.	--
List o PW1 – List o	f the witnes Mr.S.M.Vima f Exhibits m	ses examined on the side of the defendant : lraj arked on the side of the defendant:

¶28

*Sl.* *No.*	*Exhibits*	*Description* *Dated*
1	Ex.D1 series	Vouchers, Invoice, Receipt and Weighment certificate etc. 04.03.2012 to 25.09.2012
2	Ex.D2 series	Vouchers, Cash Bill, Tax Invoice etc., 05.02.2013 to 20.10.2013
dsa		16.03.2018

¶29

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶30

¶31

R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.

dsa

C.S.No.17 of 2014

16.03.2018

http://www.judis.nic.in

S.M.Vimalraj v. Mr.S.M.Vimalraj

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.M.Vimalraj v. Mr.S.M.Vimalraj

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Velusamy Vs M.Vivekanandan

Sri Loga Vinayagar Temple Vs Shankari Ammal

Vidyodya Parents Teachers Vs Vidyodya Schools Society

P.Elavarasan Vs Mrs.a.Sujatha

P.Parthasarathy Vs P.K.Kannan

Prema Suryanarayanan Vs S.Venkataraman