P.Parthasarathy v. P.K.Kannan
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal disposed following settlement between parties via Joint Compromise dated 12.10.2017. Memo forms part of decree.
What did the court decide?
Appeal disposed based on Joint Compromise Memo which forms part of the decree; no costs. Connected petitions closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 20.03.2018
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBRAMANIAN
A.S.No.425 of 2013
and M.P.No.1 of 2013 and C.M.P.No.1295 of 2017
Mr.P.Parthasarathy ... Appellant
Vs. 1.P.K.Kannan 2.E.Sundarshan 3.The State, Rep. by the Sub-Registrar, Villivakkam, Chennai-600 102. ... Respondents
Prayer : Appeal filed under Section 96 of Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree in O.S.No.24 of 2012 dated 15.02.2013 on the file of the III Additional District Judge at Poonamallee (Fast Track Court III).
For Appellant : Mr.A.S.Mujibur Rahman For Respondents : Mr.A.R.Pragash
The matter was referred to the Tamil Nadu Mediation and Conciliation Centre, High Court, Madras and the Mediation report has been received stating that the matter has been settled between the parties in terms of the Joint Compromise Memo dated 12.10.2017, that has been filed before the Mediation Centre.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mr. P. Parthasarathy
- respondent
P. K. Kannan
- respondent
E. Sundarshan
- respondent
The State
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court