K.Ravi v. Mrs. K.Indiraniammal
Case brief
What is this about?
During cross-examination, the plaintiff admitted that a preliminary decree was passed in the partition suit but denied that a final decree had been passed for the A, C, and D schedules. He admitted defendants reside in their allotted shares, while claiming he can claim mesne profit from the B schedule property, which defendants alleged was agricultural land without residential portions and where h
What the court decided
1
BEFORE THE ADDITIONAL MASTER I, HIGH COURT, MADRAS
A.No.987 of 2022 in C.S.No.132 of 2013
Date : 20.11.2024 Time : 10.50 A.M.
Name : Mr.K.Ravi (PW1)
Age : 57 Years
Father's Name : Late Mr.Kasthuri Mudaliar
Residential Address : Old No.11-A, New No.27, VGP Salai, Saidapet, Chennai – 600 015.
PW1 Chief Examination by M/s.T.T.Ravichandran, the learned counsel for the Applicant/Plaintiff.
Solemnly affirmed:
I am the Applicant/Plaintiff herein. I am filing my proof affidavit stating the facts of this case and the same may be treated as part and parcel of my examination-in-chief.
Time: 10.55 A.M.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the claim for mesne profit (arrear of rent) is maintainable pending passage of the final decree in the partition suit.
Whether the plaintiff is entitled to mesne profit from the B Schedule property alleged to be agricultural land/manthoppu without residential portions.
Whether the plaintiff is entitled to claim mesne profit despite concurrent possession by defendants in the allotted portions.
Coram
Additional Master I, High Court, Madras
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court