P.Thangavelu, v. S.Joseph
Case brief
What is this about?
Held the Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 against the dismissal of an attachment before judgment application was dismissed with direction to dispose of the main suit for recovery within six months.
What did the court decide?
Directed to dispose of the main suit within six months; no costs.
What the court decided
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 24.04.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.V.MURALIDARAN
CRP(MD)(PD).No.893 of 2018 and C.M.P.(MD) Nos.3957 and 3958 of 2018
P.Thangavelu ... Petitioner/Petitioner/Plaintiff
Vs.
S.Joseph .. Respondent/Respondent/Defendant
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair and decreetal order dated 18.12.2017 passed in I.A.No.503 of 2016 in O.S.No.273 of 2016 on the file of the II Additional Subordinate Judge at Nagercoil.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.P.Senthil
O R D E R
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the learned subordinant judge erred in dismissing the application for attachment before judgment.
Whether the Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 against the lower court's order should be allowed.
Whether the main suit for recovery of the borrowed sum can be expedited.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P.Thangavelu
- respondent
S.Joseph
Coram
M.V.Muralidaran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court