The High Court dismissed a Civil Revision Petition filed by tenants challenging rent control orders for want of prosecution, as neither side appeared after multiple listings. The connected miscellaneous petition was closed.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 19.06.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE P.T. ASHA
C.R.P.(NPD).No.1925 of 2003 and CMP No.20217 of 2003
1.Theresa (deceased) ..Petitioner/Tenant 2.Mary Magimai Doss 3.G.Sampoornam 4.A.Jayamani 5.A.Celine 6.A.Soundararajan 7.P.Jeeva ... 2 to 7Petitioners/LRS of the Deceased Sole Petitioner Vs.
St. Thomas Hospital and Leprosy Centre, Cetpet rep.by its Medical Superintendent, Chetpet and Post, Polur Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District. ... Respondent/Landlord
(Petitioners 2 to 7 brought on record as legal representatives of the deceased sole petitioner viz., Theresa vide Court order dated 16.11.2017 made in CMPs.19569 to 19571 of 2017 in CRP.1925 of 2003)
Prayer: Petition filed under Section 25 of the Rent Control Act against the fair and decreetal order of the learned Subordinate Judge, Arani (Rent Control Appellate Authority) dated 10.10.2003 in R.C.A.No.Nil of 2003 and that of the fair and decreetal order of the learned District Munsif (Rent Controller), Polur, dated 07.03.2003 in R.C.O.P.No.1 of 1992.
For Petitioners: No appearance For Respondent : No appearance ORDER
The above matter was directed to be posted for dismissal by order dated 11.04.2018 since there was no representation on either side. Once again when the matter was called on 07.06.2018, there was no representation on either side and the matter was directed to be listed for dismissal on the next single sitting date.
2.Today, when the matter was called at 03.00 pm, there was no representation on either side. Once again when the matter was called at 04.35 pm, there was no representation on either side, though the same has been posted under the caption for dismissal.
In view of there being no representation, the Civil Revision Petition stands dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
s/d-
Assistant Registrar(CO)
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
mps
To
1.The Subordinate Judge, (Rent Control Appellate Authority),
Arani
2.The District Munsif (Rent Controller), Polur.
C.R.P.(NPD).No.1925 of 2003
and CMP No.20217 of 2003
CA(CO)
SP(28/06/2018)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Theresa (deceased)
St. Thomas Hospital and Leprosy Centre
P.T. Asha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
