Dismissed

V.Panneerselvam v. Mr.U.Alagarasu

Madras HC12 Jan 2018CRP/643/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court received permission from learned counsel for the petitioners to withdraw interconnected Civil Revision Petitions. The order dismissed the petitions as withdrawn, closed the connected miscellaneous petitions, and resolved the matter without detailed judicial reasoning.

What did the court decide?

Civil Revision Petitions dismissed as withdrawn; connected miscellaneous petitions closed.

V.Panneerselvam Vs Mr.U.Alagarasu — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 12.01.2018

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI

¶5

C.R.P.(PD)Nos.643 & 644 of 2014 & M.P.Nos.1 & 1 of 2014

¶6

1.V.Panneerselvam President, Reserve Bank SC/St & Buddhist Employees' Association, Reserve Bank of India, Chennai 600 001. 2.E.Murugesan Secretary, Reserve Bank SC/St & Buddhist Employees' Association, Reserve Bank of India, Chennai 600 001. 3.P.Devarajan Treasurer Reserve Bank SC/St & Buddhist Employees' Association, Reserve Bank of India, Chennai 600 001. .. Petitioners in both C.R.Ps. Vs. 1.U.Alagarasu HOA Record Clerk, Issue Department, Reserve Bank of India, Chennai 600 001.

¶7

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶8

¶9

2.S.K.Mohanavelu

¶10

Manager, DBS, Reserve Bank of India, Chennai 600 001.

¶11

3.T.S.Karunakaran,

¶12

Assistant Manager, Cash Department, Reserve Bank of India, Chennai 600 001.

¶13

4.D.Munusamy Special Assistant, IBD/PAD, Reserve Bank of India, Chennai 600 001. .. Respondents in both C.R.Ps.

¶14

COMMON PRAYER: Civil Revision Petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decretal orders dated 03.01.2014 passed in C.M.A.Nos.137 & 144 of 2013 on the file of the I Additional City Civil Court, Chennai.

¶15

For Petitioners : Mr.R.Thiagarajan for Mr.K.M.Ramesh Kumar

¶16

For Respondents : Mr.R.Munusamy

¶17

C O M M O N O R D E R

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this

¶19

Court to withdraw these petitions and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶20

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶21

¶22

Recording the endorsement made by the learned counsel

¶23

for the petitioners, these Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed as

¶24

withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

¶25

12.01.2018
gsa
To
The Judge,
I Additional City Civil Court,
Chennai.

¶26

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶27

¶28

V.M.VELUMANI,J.

¶29

gsa
C.R.P.(PD)Nos.643 & 644 of 2014
& M.P.Nos.1 & 1 of 2014

¶30

12.01.2018

¶31

http://www.judis.nic.in

V.Panneerselvam v. Mr.U.Alagarasu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

V.Panneerselvam v. Mr.U.Alagarasu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Neena Vs P. Karthik S/O B. Palanisamy

N.Vijayalakshmi Vs S.Raja

N.Vijayalakshmi Vs M.Ramakrishna

V.C.Ravichandran Vs K.Nirmala Kuppusamy

Subbammal Vs Pottiammal

R.v.Sridharan Vs Sri Ram City Union Finance Ltd.