High Court of Madras dismissed a Civil Revision Petition under Article 226 (sic, context implies 227) for default as the petitioner failed to appear, echoing a previous direction.
Civil Revision Petition dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 11.01.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI
C.R.P.(PD)No.1204 of 2015
1Neena .. Petitioner
Vs.
P.Karthick .. Respondent
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the fair and decretal order dated 21.01.2015 made in I.A.No.2213 of 2014 in H.M.O.P.No.533 of 2014 on the file of the Principal Family Judge, Coimbatore.
For Petitioners : No appearance
For Respondent : Mr.N.Ishtiaq Ahmed
O R D E R
When the matter was taken up for hearing on 10.01.2018,
there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the
matter was directed to be posted today under the caption 'for dismissal'. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the
2
petitioner. Therefore, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for
default. No costs.
11.01.2018
gsa
To
The Principal Family Judge,
Coimbatore.
V.M.VELUMANI, J.
3
gsa
C.R.P.(PD)No.1204 of 2015
11.01.2018
Neena
P. Karthick
V.M. Velumani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
