Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 226 was dismissed. The High Court held that the lower court did not commit any error in rejecting a belated application for summoning revenue officials to authenticate documents already produced by the petitioners.
Civil Revision Petition dismissed; consequential connected miscellaneous petition closed. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 17.12.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH
C.R.P(PD) No.4096 of 2018
and
CMP.No.22627 of 2018
1.K.R.Raju
2.R.Srinivasan ..Petitioners
Vs
1.R.Rangasami
2.P.Manickam
3.K.Rajamanickam ..Respondents
Prayer:- Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to set aside the Order and Decretal order dated 18.09.2018 made in I.A.No.22 of 2018 in O.S.No.351 of 2012 on the file of Principal District Munsif, Tiruchengode.
For Petitioner :Mr.C.Rajasekaran
ORDER
The prayer sought for in the present petition is to set aside the Order and Decretal order dated 18.09.2018 made in I.A.No.22 of 2018 in O.S.No.351 of 2012 on the file of Principal District Munsif, Tiruchengode.
2
2.The learned Principal District Munsiff, Tiruchengode had rejected the petitioners' application on the ground that the petitioners had filed this application belatedly seeking for summoning of the revenue officials to establish certain documents. When the suit was posted for arguments, it is seen that the petitioners herein/Defendants had already produced the original patta before the trial Court. I do not find any reason as to why the Revenue officials should be summoned to establish such documents. Further more, it is seen that the petitioners have not adduced any reason as to why he had not taken out this application at an earlier point of time. As Such, I do not find any infirmity in the lower Court finding that the petitioners have made the application belatedly.
17.12.2018
Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No vsn/dh
To The learned Principal District Munsif, Tiruchengode.
3
M.S. RAMESH.J.,
vsn/dh
C.R.P(PD) No.4096 of 2018
and
CMP.No.22627 of 2018
17.12.2018
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Civil Revision Petition should be allowed to set aside the lower court order rejecting a belated application for summoning revenue officials.
K.R.Raju
R.Srinivasan
R.Rangasami
P.Manickam
K.Rajamanickam
M.S. Ramesh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
