Hari Raaj M v. Prathipa
Case brief
What is this about?
This single paragraph order notes the High Court learned Government Advocate's submission that a charge sheet was filed in the related criminal case. Consequently, the Contempt Petition was recorded as closed.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 14.12.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH
Cont.P.No.2540 of 2018
M.Hari Raaj ... Petitioner
Vs.
Prathipa
The Inspector of Police, (Crime)
M-3, Puzhal Police Station,
Puzhal, Chennai - 600 066. ... Respondent
PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the
Contempt of the Courts Act praying to punish the respondent
for having disobedience of the order passed by the Hon'ble
High Court passed in Crl.O.P.No.8411 of 2018 dated
20.03.2018.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Arun Kumar
For Respondent : Mr.B.Arulmozhimaran
Government Advocate
(Crl. Side)
ORDER
Heard Mr.R.Arun Kumar, learned counsel for the
petitioner and Mr.B.Arulmozhimaran, learned Government
Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondent.
2
- Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. side) on instructions, submitted that the charge sheet has been filed in R.C.S.No.4789 of 2018 dated 28.11.2018 and the case was taken on file by Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvallore.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Contempt Petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of the Courts Act should be dismissed due to filing of charge sheet in criminal case.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M.Hari Raaj
- respondent
Prathipa
Coram
M.S.RAMESH
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court