R. Anandan v. M. Chandran
Case brief
What is this about?
Revision Petition dismissed. Court held that petitioner failed to provide satisfactory reasons for condoning an inordinate delay of over five years to set aside an ex parte decree, confirming the lower court's order.
What did the court decide?
Civil Revision Petition dismissed. Impugned order confirmed. No order as to costs.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 21.02.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D. KRISHNAKUMAR
CRP (PD) No.3446 of 2016
R.Anandan .. Petitioner
Vs
M.Chandran .. Respondent
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to set aside the order dated 17.12.2015 in I.A.No.1229 of 2015 in O.S.No.93 of 2003 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Udhagamandalamm.
For Petitioner : Mr. A.L.Ganthimathi
For Respondent : Mrs.R.Meenal O R D E R
This Civil Revision Petition has been filed to set aside the order dated 17.12.2015 in I.A.No.1229 of 2015 in O.S.No.93 of 2003 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Udhagamandalam.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Subordinate Judge erred in dismissing the application to condone an inordinate delay of 4155 days without satisfactory reasons.
Whether this Court should interfere under Article 227 when the delay condonation is found to be without justifiable reasons.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
R.Anandan
- respondent
M.Chandran
Coram
D. KRISHNAKUMAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court