C.Manoharan v. R.Nagarajan
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioners filed a contempt petition for non-compliance of an order dated 19.01.2017. The respondents submitted that the impugned order has been complied with, a fact not disputed by the petitioner. The Court closed the contempt petition accordingly since no further proceedings were necessary.
What did the court decide?
The contempt petition is closed as the impugned order has been complied with.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 20.2.2018 C O R A M
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR
Contempt Petition No.1972 of 2017
1 C.Manoharan
2 M.Alamelumangai
3 V.Yogam ... Petitioners
Vs.
1 R.Nagarajan
The Special Deputy Collector (Stamps),
Office of the District Collector,
Tanjore - 613 001.
2 Nagamuthu
Joint Sub Registrar,
Office of the Joint Sub Registrar,
Mahadhana street, Mayiladuthurai,
Nagapattinam District. ... Respondents
Contempt petition is filed under Section 11 of the
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for non compliance of the order
of this court dated 19.01.2017 made in W.P.No.31343 of 2013.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.Ravi Shankar Rao For Respondents: Mr.Elumalai, G.A. ****
O R D E R
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the order passed in W.P.No.31343 of 2013 dated 19.01.2017 has been complied with by the respondents.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
C.Manoharan
- petitioner
M.Alamelumangai
- petitioner
V.Yogam
- respondent
R.Nagarajan
- respondent
Nagamuthu
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court