Kandasamy v. K.Shanmugam
Case brief
What is this about?
Default dismissal order for failure to pursue a Civil Revision Petition pending since 2015 due to repeated delays by petitioners.
What did the court decide?
Civil Revision Petition dismissed for default; connected Miscellaneous Petition closed.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADRAS
DATED: 12.12.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH
C.R.P. (PD) No. 23 of 2015
and
M.P. No. 1 of 2015
1. Kandasamy
2. Muthusamy
3. Velusamy ...Petitioners
Vs
1. K.Shanmugam
2. The Commissioner,
Municipality, Namakkal.
3. Palanivel ...Respondents
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the fair and decreetal order of the learned Principal District Munsif, Namakkal in I.A.No.620 of 2013 in O.S.No.119 of 2013 dated 15.04.2014.
For Petitioners : Mr.S.Victor Prasath for P1 and P2 For Respondents : Mr.M.Raja Mathivanan for R2 Mr.T.Dhanyakumar for R3 No Appearance for R1
2
O R D E R
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Kandasamy
- petitioner
Muthusamy
- petitioner
Velusamy
- respondent
K.Shanmugam
- respondent
The Commissioner, Municipality, Namakkal
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court