The Division Bench dismissed a Civil Revision Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution because the learned counsel for the petitioner sought and obtained permission to withdraw the petition, resulting in the closure of connected miscellaneous petitions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADRAS
DATED: 12.12.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH
C.R.P. (NPD) No.100 of 2015
and
M.P. No. 1 of 2015
P.Murugesan ...Petitioner
Vs
1. Mary Amalore Arulananda
Rep. by her Power Agent, Mary Felix Benjamin
2. Mary Felix Benjamin
3. Muthulakshmi ...Respondents
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the order of return dated 06.01.2015 in E.A.SR.No.3883 of 2014 in E.A.No.39 of 2014 in E.P.No.25 of 2012 in RCOP.No.05 of 2001, on the file of the learned Principal District Munsif, Karaikal and consequently direct the learned Principal District Munsif to number the same for adjudication.
For Petitioner : Mr.N.V.Pressanna for M/s.Sai Bharath and Ilan For Respondents : No Appearance
2
M.S.RAMESH.,J
hvk
O R D E R
Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, the learned
counsel for the revision petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Civil Revision Petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect. 3. Recording the submission and the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the revision petitioner, the present Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 12.12.2018 Index:Yes/No Speaking order: Yes/No
hvk
C.R.P. (NPD) No.100 of 2015 and M.P. No. 1 of 2015
P.Murugesan
Mary Amalore Arulananda
Mary Felix Benjamin
Muthulakshmi
M.S. Ramesh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
