The High Court of Madras dismissed two Civil Revision Petitions for default as neither party appeared. The petition sought setting aside an inferior court order regarding a civil suit, but the matter was disposed of without hearing due to non-appearance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADRAS
DATED: 19.12.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH
C.R.P. (PD) Nos. 156 & 157 of 2015
R.Upendran ...Petitioner in all CRPs
Vs
K.A.Rajesh Krishna ...Respondent in all CRPs
COMMON PRAYER: Civil Revision Petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the order dated 24.11.2014 made in I.A.Nos.9202 and 9203 of 2014 in O.S.No.1506 of 2014 on the file of the learned XV Assistant Judge, City Civil court, Chennai.
For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondent : No Appearance
C O M M O N O R D E R
The prayer sought for in these revision petitions is to set aside the order dated 24.11.2014 made in I.A.Nos.9202 and 9203 of 2014 in O.S.No.1506 of 2014 on the file of the learned XV Assistant Judge, City Civil court, Chennai.
2
representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter came to be listed today, under the caption 'for dismissal'. Even today, there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the present Civil Revision Petitions
are dismissed for default.
19.12.2018
Index:Yes/No
Speaking order: Yes/No
hvk
3
M.S.RAMESH.,J
hvk
C.R.P. (PD) Nos. 156 & 157 of 2015
19.12.2018
R.Upendran
K.A.Rajesh Krishna
M.S. RAMESH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
