Flora, v. Anand Christy
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner mother challenged Family Court visitation order granting father weekly access in public place. Court held child being an infant now need not reconcile immediately and dismissed revision upholding rights to reconcile relationship.
What did the court decide?
Civil Revision Petition dismissed. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition closed.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 18.12.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH
C.R.P.(PD)No. 228 of 2018
and
C.M.P.No.1329 of 2018
Flora ... Petitioner
Vs
Anand Christy ... Respondent
Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to set aside the impugned orders dated 04.12.2017 in I.A.No.102 of 2017 in G.O.P.No.20 of 2016 on the file of the learned Family Court at Pondicherry.
For Petitioner : Mr.S. Subramanian For Respondents : Mr.R.Mugundhan
O R D E R
Being aggrieved against the visitation right granted to the
father/respondent to visit the minor girl child once a week in a public place, the present Civil Revision Petition has been filed.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Family Court erred in granting visitation rights to the father given the minor child's hesitation to visit in a public place.
Whether the petitioners contention that the childs welfare is best served by stopping visitation is sustainable.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Flora
- respondent
Anand Christy
Coram
M.S.RAMESH
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court