The High Court dismissed the Civil Revision Petition for non-prosecution. The matter was listed twice for dismissal, and no representation appeared on the petitioner's side on either occasion.
The Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 22.06.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE P.T.ASHA
C.R.P(NPD).No.1340 of 2010
Mrs.Jaya ...Petitioner
Vs
Mrs.Lakshmi (Since deceased)
Represented by his Legal heir
M.Muniandi ...Respondent
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of the Code of civil Procedure, to set aside the order and decreetal passed in E.A.No.4752 of 2009 in E.P.No.2620 of 2008 in O.S.No.5169 of 2002 dated 04.03.2010 on the file of the X Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai consequentially to allow the application filed under Section 47 of the Civil Procedure Code, dismiss the execution petition.
2
P.T.ASHA.J,
dh
ORDER
When the matter was listed under the caption "for dismissal" on 21.06.2018, there was no representation on the side of the petitioner and the
revision was directed to be posted under the caption "for dismissal".
However, there shall be no order as to costs.
22.06.2018
Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No
dh
To
The X Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai.
C.R.P(PD).No.1340 of 2010
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the civil revision petition can be allowed in the absence of representation from the petitioner.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mrs. Jaya
M. Muniandi
P.T. ASHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
