The High Court dismissed the Criminal Revision Petition filed under Sections 397 and 401 CrPC because the revision petitioner sought and obtained permission to withdraw the petition. Connected miscellaneous petitions were also closed.
The Criminal Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 15.11.2018
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.PARTHIBAN
Crl.R.C.No.196 of 2018 and
Crl.M.P.Nos.1771 & 1772 of 2018
T.Karthikeyan .. Petitioner
vs.
State Represented by The Inspector of Police, Tiruvannamalai Rural Police Station, Tiruvannamalai 606 601.
(Crime No.373 of 2013)
.. Respondent
PRAYER : Criminal Revision Petition filed under Section 397 and 401 of Criminal Procedure Code, against the Dismissal order made in Discharge petition in Crl.M.P.No.5031 of 2015 in C.C.No.373 of 2013 on the file of the Learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Tiruvannamalai, dated 11.01.2017.
For Petitioner : Mr.A.Prakash For Respondent : Mrs.V.Saradha devi, Government Advocate O R D E R
The learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Criminal Revision petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
3.The Section Officer,
Criminal Section,
High Court Madras.
Crl.R.C.No.196 of 2018
GSP(13/12/2018)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
T. Karthikeyan
State
V. Parthiban
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
