On a joint compromise memo filed by the mother-in-law (petitioner) and the complainant (second respondent) regarding seized jewels in a dowry case, the Court disposed of the criminal revision without further order.
The Criminal Revision was disposed of on the recording of a joint compromise memo.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 22.11.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.PARTHIBAN
Crl.R.C.No.296 of 2018
Thulasi Devi .. Petitioner
Vs
1.The Sub Inspector of Police,
Bagayam Police Station,
Vellore District.
2.Meera Lakshmi .. Respondents
Prayer:- The Criminal Revision has been filed under Sections 397
& 401 of Cr.P.C., to call for the records on the file of the
learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Vellore, Vellore District in
Crl.M.P.No.163 of 2018, dated 07.02.2018 and set aside the order.
For Petitioner :Mr.E.Kannadasan
For Respondents :Mr.G.Hari Hara Arun Soma Sankaran
Government Advocate
(Criminal side) For R1
Ms.P.Devika For R2
O R D E R
Today, when the matter taken up for hearing, Joint Compromise Memo has been filed on behalf of the petitioner and the second respondent.
''1. It is humbly submitted that the second respondent herein has filed a complaint before the first respondent police and the same has been registered in Cr.No..365 of 2017 under Section 380 of IPC pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Vellore, Vellore District.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CCC)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
+1cc to M/S.E.Kannadasan, Advocate Sr.79519
Crl.R.C.No.296 of 2018
nri[co]
srg 17/12/2018
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Thulasi Devi
The Sub Inspector of Police, Bagayam Police Station, Vellore District
Meera Lakshmi
V. Parthiban
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
