Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the criminal revision petition. The court recorded the withdrawal and dismissed the petition accordingly, while also closing the connected miscellaneous petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 17.09.2018
CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN
Crl.R.C.No.899 of 2013
and
M.P.No.1 of 2013
Mr.S. Lakshmanan ... Petitioner
Vs.
1. M.T. Premalatha
2. L. Bhavani (Minor)
3. L. Gowtham (Minor) ...Respondents
Criminal Revision case filed under Section 397 read with 401
of Code of Criminal Procedure to set aside the order in
M.C.No.105/2007 on the file of the learned III Additional Family
Court, Chennai, dated 13.02.2012 .
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Magesh
For Respondents : Ms. Sudha Ramalingam
O R D E R
When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned
counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this
Court to withdraw the criminal revision and he has also made an
endorsement in the Court bundle to that effect.
2. Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel
appearing for the petitioner and the endorsement, the criminal
revision is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected
Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CCC)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
rli
To
The III Additional Family Court, Chennai
Crl.R.C.No.899 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 ad[co] srg 26/10/2018
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S. Lakshmanan
M.T. Premalatha
L. Bhavani
L. Gowtham
P. Velmurugan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
