This order dismisses a criminal revision under Section 397 and 401 CrPC as infructuous because the petitioner explicitly endorsed the revocation of the impugned order by the Magistrate court.
Criminal revision dismissed as infructuous; connected miscellaneous petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 14.09.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN
Crl.R.C.No.33 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013
K.Balamurugan ...Petitioner
Vs.
M/s. Ranga Weavers India (P) Ltd., represented by its Manager through Power of Attorney Ramalingam Rep. by its Partner P.Gunaseelan 84, Easwaran Koil Street, Erode – 1.
... Respondent
Prayer: The Criminal Revision filed under Section 397 read with 401 of Code of Criminal Procedure, to set aside the order of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court No.II, (Magisterial Level) Erode, dated 11.10.2012 in C.M.P.No. 6852/2012 in S.T.C.No. 177/2012.
For Petitioner : Mr.J.Antony Jesus
ORDER
When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the criminal revision has become infructuous and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
-s/dAssistant Registrar(CS-IX)
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
ssi/cgi
To
Crl.R.C.No.33 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013
NRL(CO) SP(04/10/2018)
K. Balamurugan
M/s. Ranga Weavers India (P) Ltd.
P. Velmurugan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
