S.M.Mani v. R.Nirmala
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court in revision quashed a confirmed conviction and acquitted the accused petitioner after recording evidence of a settlement between the parties and receipt of a compromise sum.
What did the court decide?
Set aside judgment and conviction dated 20.04.2011; petitioner acquitted; Criminal Revision Petition disposed of.
What the court decided
Bail Slip in Crl Rc.835/11 : The Petitioner Sole Accused namely S.M.Mani, S/o. R.Muthusami, was directed to be released on bail as per the order of this Court 2316/11 made in MP.No.1/11 in Crl Rc.No.835/11 in the on the file of the court.
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.PONGIAPPAN
Crl.R.C.No. 835 of 2011 S.M. Mani .. Petitioner/ Accused Proprietor mani poultary farm Vs. M.Nirmala .. Respondent/ Complainant Criminal Revision filed under Sections 397 and 401 Cr.P.C. praying to set aside the judgment and conviction dated 20.04.2011 made in C.A. No. 26 of 2010 on the file of the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Namakkal confirming the judgement and conviction and partly modifying the sentence as imposed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.2, Namakkal by judgment dated 23.03.2010 made in STC.No. 633 of 2007.
For Petitioner : Mr.T.Munirathnam Naidu For Respondent : Mr.C.Prakasam O R D E R
This revision has been filed by the petitioner to set aside the judgment and conviction dated 20.04.2011 made in C.A. No. 26 of 2010 on the file of the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Namakkal confirming the judgement and conviction and partly modifying the sentence as imposed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.2, Namakkal in a judgment dated 23.03.2010 made in STC.No. 633 of 2007.
- Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing Mr.T.Munirathnam Naidu, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as Mr.C.Prakasam, learned counsel appearing for the respondent are present.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the judgment and conviction under challenge should be set aside upon receipt of settlement and acquittal of the petitioner?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S.M. Mani
- respondent
M. Nirmala
Coram
R. Pongiappan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court