Neelavathy v. Balasubramani
Case brief
What is this about?
Revision petition for enhancement of maintenance dismissed as infructuous since the respondent died, pending from 2011.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 23.04.2018
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.PONGIAPPAN
Crl.R.C.No. 1050 of 2011
Neelavathy .. Petitioner Vs. Balasubramani .. Respondent Criminal Revision filed under Sections 397 and 401 Cr.P.C. praying to set aside the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate Court No.I, Tiruvallur in CMP. No.4110 of 2009 dated 30.06.2011 and direct the respondent to pay a maintenance of Rs.5,000/- to the petitioner.
For Petitioner : Mr.A.Dhiravianathan For Respondent : Mr.T.Ravi ***** O R D E R This revision has been filed by the petitioner in CMP. No. 4110 of 2009 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Tiruvallur seeking relief to enhance the maintenance amount ordered in M.C. No. 12 of 1996 dated 10.08.1999. Subsequent to the enquiry, the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Tiruvallur, in his order dated 30.06.2011, refused to enhance the maintenance amount and dismissed the same. However, the learned Judicial Magistrate further directed the respondent to pay a sum of Rs.5,000/- to the petitioner towards filing expenses incurred by her, against which the present petition has been filed by the petitioner, which is pending from the year 2011.
- Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr.A.Dhiravianathan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as Mr.T.Ravi, learned counsel appearing for the respondent are present.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Neelavathy
- respondent
Balasubramani
Coram
R. Pongiappan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court