D.Pushpakaran v. P.Idhvani
Case brief
What is this about?
The criminal revision was dismissed for non-prosecution as no representation was filed on behalf of the petitioner. The connected miscellaneous petition was also dismissed.
What did the court decide?
Criminal revision dismissed for non-prosecution and connected miscellaneous petition dismissed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 09.10.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN
Crl.R.C.No.816 of 2013 and
Crl.M.P.No.1 of 2013
D.Pushpakaran ...Petitioner/Respondent Vs. P.Idhvani ...Respondent/Petitioner
This Criminal Revision filed under Section 397 read with 401 of Code of Criminal Procedure against the order dated 04.11.2011 made in M.C.No.45 of 2011, by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Tambaram.
For Petitioner: Mr.S.Manickam – No Appearance For Respondent: Mr.P.Senthilkumar
O R D E R
When the criminal revision was taken up for hearing on 04.10.2018, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and hence the matter was directed to be listed on 04.10.2018 under the caption “for dismissal”.
2 Accordingly, today, the matter is listed under the caption “for dismissal”, even today also there is no representation for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the respondent is present. Hence this Court is inclined to dismiss the criminal revision for non prosecution.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
D.Pushpakaran
- respondent
P.Idhvani
Coram
P Velmurugan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court