Rajaboopathy v. Joseph Raj
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal filed under Section 378 CrPC to set aside a judgment dismissing conviction. Dismissed for non-prosecution as appellant failed to appear and file representation on hearing dates.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 05.10.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN
Crl.A.No.454 of 2013
Rajaboopathy
...Appellant/Complainant
Vs.
Joseph Raj ...Respondent/Accused
This Criminal Appeal filed under Section 378(4) of Code of Criminal Procedure to set aside the judgment dated 01.04.2013 made in Crl.A.No.23 of 2012 on the file of the learned III Additional District Sessions Judge,(Cuddalore) Viruthachalam in dismissing the conviction and sentence made in judgment dated 08.03.2012 in C.C. No.112 of 2010 on the file of the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Neyveli.
When the Criminal Appeal was taken up for hearing on 28.09.2018, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant and the matter was posted on 05.10.2018 under the caption "for disposal".
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Rajaboopathy
- respondent
Joseph Raj
Coram
P.Velmurugan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court