The High Court of Madras dismissed a Criminal Revision petition and connected miscellaneous petitions filed through counsel's submission and formal endorsement of the application to withdraw, resulting in closure with no substantive adjudication.
None; petitions withdrawn and dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 26.03.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN
Crl.R.C.No.375 of 2018 and Crl.M.P.Nos.4601 & 4602 of 2018
Dr.Mayilvahanan Natarajan
... Petitioner/Petitioner/Accused 8 Vs.
State represented by Superintendent of Police, CBI/ACB, Chennai ..Respondent/Respondent/Complainant
Prayer: Criminal Revision petition filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of Criminal Procedure Code, praying to call for First Information Report the records and set aside the order dated 5 th February 2018 in Crl.M.P.No.6462/2014 in C.C.No.15/2014 on the file of the XII Additional Sessions and Special Judge for CBI cases, Chennai for offences under Sections 120(B) r/w 420 IPC, Sections 7, 8, 12 and 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
For Petitioner : Mr.C.Arun Kumar For Respondent : Mr.K.Srinivasan
Special Public Prosecutor
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2 The petitioner has also filed miscellaneous petition in Crl.M.P.No.4602 of 2018 along with the revision case, seeking order of this Court to dispense with the personal appearance of the petitioner pending disposal of the revision case. Since, the revision case itself is dismissed as withdrawn, nothing survives in the miscellaneous petition.
3 However, it is open to the petitioner to seek dispensing of the personal appearance in accordance with law, by filing petition under Section 317 or 205 of Cr.P.C. If any such application is filed the Trial Court shall pass appropriate order on merits.
4 In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Criminal Revision case is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are also closed.
s/d-
Assistant Registrar(CS VI)
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
rpl
To
1. The XII Additional Sessions and Special Judge for CBI Cases
Chennai.
2. The Superintendent of Police,
CBI/ACB,
Chennai
3 The Special Public Prosecutor for CBI cases,
High Court, Madras.
+1 Cc to Mr.C. Arunkumar, advocate sr 24048.
Crl.R.C.No.375 of 2018
and Crl.M.P.Nos.4601 & 4602 of 2018
MR(CO)
SP(12/04/2018)
Dr. Mayilvahanan Natarajan
State represented by Superintendent of Police, CBI/ACB, Chennai
G. Jayachandran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
