A petition filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone a 62-day delay in filing a review application was dismissed by the High Court of Madras on the grounds that the reasons stated in the supporting affidavit were unsatisfactory.
Petition for condonation of delay dismissed. Review application also dismissed. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated:26.03.2018
Coram:
The Hon'ble Dr.Justice G.Jayachandran
C.M.P.No.10265 of 2017
and
Rev.Appl.No.SR41405 of 2017
1.K.N.Palanisamy
2.Valliammal
3.Thangavel
4.Venkatachalam
5.Poongodi
6.Magudeshwaran .. Petitioners
/versus/
1.Subbayal
2.Ponnayal
3.K.S.Kumarasamy
4.K.S.Palanisamy
5.K.N.Subramaniam
6.K.M.Mani
7.Palanisamy
8.Deivasigamani
9.Valliammal
10.Palanisamy Gounder
11.Subbaia Gounder
12.Ponnusamy
13.Thangarasu
14.Valliammal
15.Karuppayal
16.Subbayal .. Respondents
2
Petition is filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act praying to condone the delay of 62 days in filing Review S.R.No.41405 of 2017 in S.A.No.1516 of 2007.
For Petitioners :Mr.A.Gokula Krishnan
-----
O R D E R
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and
perused the materials on record.
petition is not satisfactory. Hence, this petition to condone the delay of 62 days in filing the review application is dismissed. In view of the order passed in C.M.P.No.10265 of 2017, the review application in
Rev.Appl.No.SR41405 of 2017 is also dismissed. No costs.
26.03.2018
ari
3
Dr.G.Jayachandran,J.
ari
C.M.P.No.10265 of 2017
and
Rev.Appl.No.SR41405 of 2017
26.03.2018
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 62 days in filing a review application is condonable under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
K.N.Palanisamy
Subbayal
Dr.G.Jayachandran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
