Partly allowed

Sarathkumar v. Iop Awps Sooramnglm Salem

Madras HC13 Nov 2018CRL MP/12929/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court relaxed a bail condition requiring the petitioner to appear twice weekly before the trial court. Recognizing the petitioner is a polytechnic student who had complied with earlier conditions, the modification reduced the appearance requirement to once monthly.

What did the court decide?

The bail condition was modified from appearing twice weekly to appearing once every calendar month before the Trial Court.

Sarathkumar Vs Iop Awps Sooramnglm Salem — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Tuesday, the Thirteenth day of November Two Thousand Eighteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr Justice V. PARTHIBAN

¶6

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.12929 of 2018

¶7

IN CRL A.209/2017

¶8

SARATHKUMAR [ PETITIONER/APPELLANT] Vs THE STATE REP. BY, [ RESPONDENT] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, SOORAMANGALAM, SALEM DISTRICT.(CR.NO.23/2014)

¶9

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition that the appearance before the trial court weekly twice viz., on the first and last working days of every week at 10.30 a.m until further orders imposed by an order dated 25.06.2018 in Crl.M.P.No.11593/2017 in Crl.A.No.209/2017.

¶10

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.R.EZHILARASAN, Advocate for the petitioner and of Mrs.V.SARADHA DEVI, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) on behalf of the Respondent the court made the following order:-

¶11

Earlier, this Court has passed an order on 25.06.2018 in Crl.M.P.No.11593 of 2017, imposing a condition for grant of bail by directing the petitioner to appear before the Trial Court weekly twice, viz. , on the first and last working days of every week at 10.30 a.m.

¶12

2. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the respondent would submit that the condition imposed by this Court, has been duly complied with by the petitioner herein till 05.11.2018.

¶13

3. Under such circumstances, the petitioner is before this Court seeking relaxation of the condition imposed by this Court vide order dated 25.06.2018.

¶14

4. Considering the fact that the petitioner is a student of the Polytechnic College and he has been duly complying with the condition imposed by this Court till recently, the condition as imposed on the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ petitioner shall stand modified as under.

¶15

5. The petitioner shall appear before the Trial Court on the first working day of every calendar month henceforth. This condition shall continue until further orders from this Court.

¶16

-sd/-

¶17

13/11/2018

¶18

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶19

TRUE COPY

¶20

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104. TO 1 THE MAHILA COURT, SALEM. 2 THE SESSIONS JUDG, MAHILA COURT, SALEM. 3 THE PRINCIPAL SESSIONS JUDGE, SALEM. [FOR INFORMATION] 4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS. 5 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, SOORAMANGALAM, SALEM DISTRICT. C.C. to M/S.R.EZHILARASAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges

¶21

Order in CRL MP.12929/2018 in CRL A.209/2017 Date :13/11/2018

¶22

From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format THS : 19.11.2018

¶23

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Sarathkumar v. Iop Awps Sooramnglm Salem

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sarathkumar v. Iop Awps Sooramnglm Salem

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.Henry Raj Vs M/S.Dugar Housing Developement India Ltd.

Thoulath Nisha@Ponnachi Vs Mohammed Sirajudeen

M.Siva, Aged 46 Years, Vs K.Vadiyappan

Sakthivel Vs State by

Sudhakaran Nair Vs M/S.Arjunamaravathi Chits Pvt. Ltd.

S.Rajaseelan @ Harish Kumar Vs R.Malathi