Allowed

Pushparaj, v. the Deputy Superintendent of

Madras HC20 Jun 2018CRL OP(MD)/9998/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners accused under SC/ST (POA) Act 2015 and IPC. It directed surrender within two weeks, mandatory notification to the de facto complainant, and ordered the Special Court to dispose of the regular bail application on the same day.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners permitted to surrender within two weeks; Special Court directed to consider bail application same day.

Pushparaj, Vs the Deputy Superintendent of — Caste Atrocities | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Wednesday, the Twentieth day of June Two Thousand Eighteen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶5

CRL OP(MD) No.9998 of 2018

¶6

1 PUSHPARAJ,

¶7

2 GANESAN, ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 & 2

¶8

¶9

1 THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,

¶10

ALANGUDI, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT.

¶11

2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KARAMBAKUDI POLICE STATION, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT.

¶12

(CR.NO.114/2018) ...RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINAITS

¶13

3 NAGARAJAN, ...RESPONDENT/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT

¶14

For Petitioners : Mr.D.RAMESHKUMAR Advocate

¶15

For Respondent : Mr.A.ROBINSON, Government Advocate ( Crl. Side)

¶16

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶17

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶18

The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 323 and 427 of I.P.C. r/w. 3 (1) (r) (s), 3 (2) (v-a) of SC/ST (POA) Act 2015 in Crime No.114 of 2018 on the file of the respondent Police and seek anticipatory bail.

¶19

2 .Taking note of the nature of the allegations made against the petitioners, the petitioners are permitted to surrender before the learned Jurisdictional Special Court within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶20

3 .The petitioners shall notify the de facto complainant with regard to the exact date of surrender through registered post. This communication shall be sent at-least one week in advance before the date of surrender. Service of such notice will be taken as service on the de facto complainant for the purpose of statute. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶21

4 .On such surrender by the petitioners and their application for regular bail, the Jurisdictional Special Court is directed to consider the bail application and dispose of the same on the same day.

¶22

5 .With these observations and directions, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

¶23

sd/-

¶24

20/06/2018 / TRUE COPY /

¶25

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

¶26

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶27

Madurai - 625 023.

¶28

TO 1 THE DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE (PCR COURT), PUDUKKOTTAI

¶29

2 THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ALANGUDI, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT.

¶30

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KARAMBAKUDI POLICE STATION, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT.

¶31

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶32

+1. CC to M/S.D.RAMESHKUMAR Advocate SR.No.10865

¶33

TSG

¶34

GJM/CM/VR/ASVM/22.6.18-2P-6C

¶35

ORDER IN

¶36

CRL OP(MD) No.9998 of 2018 Date :20/06/2018

¶37

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Pushparaj, v. the Deputy Superintendent of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pushparaj, v. the Deputy Superintendent of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S. Jaya Engineering Works Vs Bharat

Emily Parade Joshansan, Vs the Inspector of Police

Mani @ Sivasubramanian Vs the Inspector of Police

Aravind Vs the Inspector of Police

Dhanalakshmi Vs the Inspector of Police

Vijay Mohan Vs the Inspector of Police