Dismissed

Baskar v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC8 Jun 2018CRL OP(MD)/9285/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal bail petition filed by an accused facing charges of murder, kidnapping, and damaging evidence. Court refused bail citing custody exceeding 140 days, absconding for four years, and lack of reasons for absence. Petitioner directed to renew after framing charges.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Original Petition for bail dismissed; petitioner directed to renew bail application after framing of charges.

Baskar Vs the Inspector of Police — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Eighth day of June Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT

¶2

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶3

CRL OP(MD) No.9285 of 2018

¶4

BASKAR ... PETITIONER /SOLE ACCUSED

¶5

STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE RAILWAY POLICE STATION, TRICHY DISTRICT. CRIME NO.263 OF 2018 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT

¶6

For Petitioner : Mr.R.KARUNANIDHI, Advocate For Respondent : Mr.A.P.G.OHM CHAIRMA PRABHU, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)

¶7

PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C.

¶8

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶9

The petitioner is arrayed sole Accused. He was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 19.01.2018 for the offences punishable under Sections 364, 394, 302 and 201 IPC, in Crime No.263 of 2012 on the file of the respondent police. He seeks bail.

¶10

2.The petitioner was arrested and remanded to judicial custody pursuant to enforcement of Non Bailable Warrant issued against the petitioner. It is true that the petitioner is in custody for more than 140 days. But the fact that he was absconding for more than four year. In the present bail petition, no reason has been shown for his abscondance.

¶11

3.The learned Government Advocate submits that the case is presently pending at the stage of framing charges.

¶12

4.Taking note of all these aspects, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. The petitioner is directed to renew his bail application after framing charges.

¶13

/ TRUE COPY /

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶16

¶17

1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE RAILWAY POLICE STATION, TRICHY DISTRICT.

¶18

2 THE SUPERINTENDENT,CENTRAL PRISON, TRICHY.

¶19

3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶20

+1. CC to Mr.R.KARUNANIDHI Advocate SR.No.9902 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.9285 of 2018 Date :08/06/2018 MS/PN/VK/18.06.2018/2P.5C

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Baskar v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Baskar v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Naganath Rajaram Patele Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

J. Prabakaran, S/O.Jeyaraj, Vs the Inspector of Police

R. Rajendran Vs the Inspector of Police

Jayamani Vs the Inspector of Police

A.C.Murugesan Vs the Inspector of Police

Malaiselvam @ Selvam Vs the Superintendent of Customs