Partly allowed

R. Rajendran v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC7 Jun 2018CRL OP(MD)/9166/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners facing potential arrest for offences including Sections 294(b), 326, and 506(ii) IPC. The court moved the petition to regular bail conditions in the Magistrate Court due to a pending property dispute.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on bail in event of arrest with conditions to execute bond and appear before Magistrate within 15 days.

R. Rajendran Vs the Inspector of Police — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Thursday, the Seventh day of June Two Thousand Eighteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶6

CRL OP(MD) No.9166 of 2018

¶7

1 R. RAJENDRAN 2 R. THAVAMANI ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN

¶8

THE STATE REPRESENTED BY

¶9

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DINDIGUL NORTH TOWN POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL.

¶10

IN CRIME NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2018 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

¶11

For Petitioners : M/S.T.ANTONY ARUL RAJ Advocate

¶12

For Respondent : MR.A.ROBINSON, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)

¶13

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶14

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶15

The petitioners are apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294 (b), 326, 506(ii) of I.P.C., in Crime No. Not known of 2018, seek anticipatory bail.

¶16

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent.

¶17

The complainant is one Geetharamani. This Court went through the contents of the said complaint. Though, the First Information Report has not been registered, there is sufficient foundation to the petitioner to apprehend that they may be arrested.

¶18

4.Taking note of the above said facts and circumstances, Since there is a property dispute, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate Court No.I, Dindigul, and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ each with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the

¶19

¶20

petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

¶21

5.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate

¶22

within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

¶23

sd/07/06/2018 / TRUE COPY /

¶24

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶25

¶26

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, DINDIGUL

¶27

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE DINDIGUL

¶28

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DINDIGUL NORTH TOWN POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL.

¶29

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,

¶30

MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,

¶31

MADURAI

¶32

+1. CC to M/S.T.ANTONY ARUL RAJ Advocate SR.No.67182

¶33

ORDER

¶34

IN CRL OP(MD) No.9166 of 2018 Date :07/06/2018 SMA/CM-VR/VK/13.06.2018:2P/6C

¶35

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

R. Rajendran v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R. Rajendran v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V. Paulpandi, Vs the Inspector of Police

P.Sekar Vs the Inspector of Police

Kalimuthu Vs the Inspector of Police

Naganath Rajaram Patele Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

J. Prabakaran, S/O.Jeyaraj, Vs the Inspector of Police

Sahul Hameed Vs the Inspector of Police